By Currents News Staff and Rhina Guidos 

WASHINGTON (CNS) — News reports say the Biden administration may lift a public health measure in May that was put in place at the start of the coronavirus pandemic that has kept asylum-seekers out.

Catholic groups that support immigrants have long been calling for an end to Title 42 of the Public Health Safety Act, which the Trump administration began using in March 2020 as infections of the coronavirus began to surge in the U.S.

Border Patrol agents were instructed to expel anyone caught trying to illegally enter the U.S. instead of processing them under existing immigration law for those seeking asylum.

Several news agencies report that Biden administration officials are signaling the end of Title 42 by May 23 though nothing has been announced.

The Biden administration has taken heat from Catholic groups, among others, for keeping Title 42 in place. Administration officials have said it was not immigration policy but a health measure and that the government would take cues from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on when to end it.

Many are expecting an increase in migrants looking for asylum at the southern border when the measure is lifted.

On March 22, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said there would be an “utter meltdown” if Title 42 were lifted.

The order, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection says on its website, prohibits “the entry of certain persons who potentially pose a health risk, either by virtue of being subject to previously announced travel restrictions or because they unlawfully entered the country to bypass health screening measures.”

Some like Anna Gallagher, executive director of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc., known as CLINIC, have attacked Title 42 since its implementation, calling it a shameful and racist action designed to keep migrants out.

“While we watch much of the nation remove their masks at the public health guidance of this administration, we simultaneously watch the same administration continue to expel vulnerable people back to harm for the supposed protection of public health. We will not stay silent in the face of such hypocrisy,” she said in a March 21 news release from CLINIC.

Women religious and their supporters protested outside the White House in December urging Title 42’s demise.

On March 30, 14 Jesuit law and immigrant advocacy institutions — including Jesuit law school deans, the Jesuit Refugee Service and the Border Justice Initiative at Gonzaga Law School — called for Title 42’s end, saying it was “unlawful, dangerous and inflicts profound suffering on extremely vulnerable people.”

There’s “no present public health justification for its continuation,” they added in a joint letter to President Joe Biden and key members of his administration.

The U.S. “must rescind Title 42 immediately so that no one is denied the right to seek protection,” Giulia McPherson, JRS director of advocacy and operations, said in the letter.

Other faith-based groups, including the Washington-based Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, also have called for its end.

“We are grateful that this long and shameful chapter in our nation’s history is coming to end,” said LIRS president and CEO Krish O’Mara Vignarajah.

The decision recognizes that people fleeing violence and persecution have the right to seek protection, she said, while acknowledging the political fallout to come from lifting the measure.

“We know there will be much political theater surrounding this decision, but we urge the administration to remain focused on upholding our nation’s legal and humanitarian obligations to those seeking safety at America’s golden doors,” she said.

Currents News Staff

More than 400 hypodermic needles were found in a homeless encampment. It’s something Mayor Eric Adams wants to clean up by removing the encampments completely.

“We’re not throwing people off the street,” said Mayor Adams. “Let’s be clear here, you have a right to sleep on the street, you don’t have a right to build a miniature house.”

So a new task force has been hitting the streets and so far, it’s dismantled nearly 250 of these sites as they try to get the most vulnerable New Yorkers into shelters. But it’s not just any shelter, more of a safe haven. It will not only offer a warm bed, but also toiletries, a locker, food and access to a health care center on site.

A big hurdle that isn’t going to be easy: convincing the homeless to go there.

“There’s a lack of trust,” the mayor said.

It’s also a big job. According to the Coalition For The Homeless, roughly 48,400 homeless people rely on city shelters each night.

That’s significantly higher than the city’s official count, which last winter, estimated the Big Apple’s homeless population at just 2,300 people.

Altogether, the coalition says more than 10,000 families and nearly 19,000 individual adults sleep in the city’s main shelter system every night.

So far, no families have been found in these encampments – some of which are underground.

As New Yorkers start to return to the office, many are back in the subways.

“It’s basically become, you know, the world’s largest mobile homeless rescue operation,” one commuter said.

Not everyone feels safe.

“Seeing homeless more than ever inside the train,” another commuter said,  “it’s very dangerous.”

In the end, the city is hoping this initiative will be a win-win for everyone.

“We must ensure that our public places are safe,” said NYPD Commissioner Keechant Sewell, “that they are accessible to all and that everyone in need of a suitable place to stay has access to one.”

After the first seven days of clearing the encampments, only about five people agreed to go to a safe haven shelter.

The mayor says he’s confident that number will go up once the workers gain the trust of the homeless.