This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. By using this site, you consent to the placement and use of these cookies. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.
ACCEPT
A 14th-century monastery holds one of the most venerated images of the Blessed Virgin Mary. It is the home to the original shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe. In her honor, a traditional pilgrimage to the Monastery of Guadalupe in Cáceres, Spain, is held each year.
However, due to the pandemic, organizers were forced to find alternate solutions to avoid breaking this tradition.
“The initial plan was to organize a grand pilgrimage, but of course, because of the pandemic, it was impossible,” explained Fr. Joaquin Garrigós of the Guadalupe Jubilee. “Large gatherings are currently not possible. Therefore, the idea switched to providing an online experience where we can make a virtual pilgrimage.”
The Diocese of Toledo, Spain, will organize a series of online events, including a virtual pilgrimage. Organizers made a spiritual itinerary available, where registered pilgrims will receive content via email every day, from Oct. 9 to Oct 12. The content will include videos, meditations, catechesis, online Masses, and even games for younger pilgrims.
“We want it to be as real as possible. We always say, that although it’s virtual, it doesn’t mean it’s not real. Sometimes these concepts are misunderstood,” said Fr. Joaquin. “The aim is to allow people to make this inner journey of encountering Jesus through the Holy Mother, without leaving home.”
Fr. Joaquin is hopeful that this online pilgrimage will be more accessible to everyone, even to faithful in other Latin American countries. So far, the website has registered people from 33 different countries across the world.
This online journey will conclude on Oct.12 precisely on Hispanic Day. For this reason, the Archbishop of Toledo will celebrate a Holy Mass in honor of Our Lady of Guadalupe, declared by the Holy See to be the Queen of Hispanic Heritage.
In his video message for the month of October, Pope Francis asked Christians to pray for the laity, especially women in leadership roles in the Church.
He observed that every Catholic is born a lay person, and that “lay people are protagonists of the Church.” The pontiff also said that “today, it is especially necessary to create broader opportunities for a more incisive female presence in the Church,” and to avoid “falling into forms of clericalism that diminish the lay charism.”
“No one has been baptized a priest or a bishop. We have all been baptized as lay people. Lay people are protagonists of the Church,” Pope Francis said. Today, it is especially necessary to create broader opportunities for a more incisive female presence in the Church. And we must emphasize the feminine lay presence because women tend to be left aside.
“We must promote the integration of women, especially where important decisions are made. We pray that by the virtue of baptism, the laity, especially women, may participate more in areas of responsibility in the Church, without falling into forms of clericalism that diminish the lay charism.”
It was the vice presidential candidates turn to take the stage for a debate — the first and only one between the two. Vice President Mike Pence and Senator Kamala Harris took extra social distancing precautions Wednesday night. They were mostly polite, but still critical of the other’s policies.
“Well, the American people have witnessed what is the greatest failure of any presidential administration in the history of our country,” Harris said.
Right from the start of the debate questions on COVID-19 arose. The national issue was further highlighted by the plexiglass partition on the debate stage. Vice President Mike Pence responded to Senator Kamala Harris by echoing President Donald Trump’s narrative of success.
“He suspended all travel from China,” Pence said, “that decision alone by President Trump bought us invaluable time.”
Another issue that was discussed — one that’s important to Catholics — was the Right to Life.
“I couldn’t be more proud to serve as vice president to a president who stands without apology for the sanctity of human life. I’m pro-life,” said Pence. “I don’t apologize for it.”
“I will always fight for a woman’s right to make decisions about her own body,” said Harris. “It should be her decision, and not that of President Trump’s or Vice President Michael Pence.”
The candidates also made clear their differences when it comes to the environment. While during the presidential debate, Joe Biden said he doesn’t support the Green New Deal, his campaign website calls it crucial for meeting the climate challenges we face. The Trump/Pence ticket is clearly against it.
“We’ve made great progress reducing CO2 emissions, through American innovations and developing natural gas through fracking,” Pence said. “We don’t need a massive two-trillion dollar Green New Deal that would impose all new mandates on American businesses and American families.”
And while Harris called for banning fracking as a presidential candidate, the Biden climate plan doesn’t take that stance.
“Joe Biden will not ban fracking,” Harris said. “That is a fact. That is a fact. I will repeat that Joe Biden has been very clear that he is thinking about growing jobs. And part of those jobs that will be created by Joe Biden are going to be about clean energy and renewable energy.”
It was a much more civil affair during the Oct. 7 vice presidential debate.
While the candidates Senator Kamala Harris and Vice President Mike Pence did get long winded and talked passed their allotted time, they didn’t interrupt as much as their running mates did and covered a multitude of issues, including religion.
St. John’s University political science professor Brian Browne joins Currents News to break down Wednesday’s debate topics.
Currents News reports secular and religious news from the Catholic perspective.
Some of the top stories on this newscast:
The Diocese of Brooklyn is taking on the state to stop church restrictions from taking effect this weekend – we speak exclusively with the attorney who filed the lawsuit.
The hallways and classrooms of one Brooklyn Catholic academy might be empty but their students are still hard at work.
Will all students and teachers in schools next to hot spots need to be tested weekly?
WINDSOR TERRACE — The Diocese of Brooklyn is taking Gov. Andrew Cuomo to court.
The diocese has filed a federal lawsuit against the governor in his official capacity and is seeking an injunction to prevent him from enforcing new rules prohibiting more than a small handful of people from taking part in religious services in so-called red zones that have been designated as COVID-19 hot spots.
In its lawsuit, the diocese charged that the restrictions imposed by Cuomo through his New Cluster Action Initiative violate First Amendment rights. The governor announced his initiative on Oct. 6. The new measures are to go into effect no later than Oct. 9.
Under Cuomo’s directive, three zones are being created — red, orange, and yellow — with red zones falling under the most severe restrictions. In orange zones, attendance at religious services is restricted to a maximum of 33 percent capacity with no more than 25 people. In yellow zones, 50 percent capacity will be permitted at services.
There are 28 churches and parishes within the red and orange zones.
Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio said the diocese had no choice but to sue. “The executive orders this week have left us with no other option than to go to court. Our churches have the capacity to accommodate many worshippers and to reset our attendance capacity to 10 people maximum in the red zone, and 25 people in the orange zone, when we have had no significant cases, impede our right to worship and cannot stand,” he said in a statement.
“The state has completely disregarded the fact that our safety protocols have worked and it is an insult to once again penalize all those who have made the safe return to church work,” the bishop added.
“This case concerns the government’s wholesale infringement of a fundamental First Amendment right — the free exercise of religion — that, if allowed to stand, will prevent parishioners in Brooklyn and Queens from being able to attend mass even though the executive order at issue is not even remotely tailored to the compelling interest required to justify interference with that fundamental right,” the lawsuit reads in part.
The filing of the lawsuit was announced on Oct. 8.
In an interview with Current News, Randy Mastro, the attorney representing the diocese, said he hoped for quick action by the court so that parishioners can attend Masses at their local churches this Sunday. “We hope to be before a judge tomorrow,” he said on Thursday.
“Public officials have a sacred duty to do right by those they serve, but this is simply wrong and wrong-headed,” Mastro said in a statement. “If this latest executive order stands, parishioners won’t be able to go to Mass this Sunday, even though the diocese has done everything right to ensure safe conditions in its churches. Thus, this religious community will be denied its most fundamental right — the free exercise of religion — and that is why we’ve gone to court to block this executive order from going into effect as applied to the diocese’s churches.”
The diocese charged that the governor’s order “is clearly untailored as applied to the diocese given the starkly different consequences the order imposes on secular business, allowing, for instance, hundreds of people to shop at a grocery store but limiting worship in a 1,200-seat church to a mere 10 parishioners (nine including clergy).”
In addition, the lawsuit contends that Cuomo is unfairly imposing the restrictions on all religious institutions, even those, like the diocese, who have obeyed social distancing rules.
“And yet this delicate balance between religious liberty and public health and safety has now been upended by the governor’s broad-brush response to combating apparent pockets of COVID-19 spikes in some faith communities by imposing on all faith communities in the affected areas disparate treatment—whether or not those communities have been compliant with the preexisting rules and operating safely, as the diocese’s churches have,” the lawsuit reads.
Technically speaking, the governor’s rule allows up to 25 percent of a church’s seating capacity to be filled in a red zone. But the rule also states that no more than 10 people can attend a service.
All houses of worship in New York State were ordered closed in March as the COVID-19 pandemic took hold in New York.
In the lawsuit, the diocese points out that it not only obeyed the state’s original closure order in March but had already put in place its own severe restrictions before the state issued its order.
“This period of closure was extremely painful for the Diocese of Brooklyn and its faith community.” the document reads. “In addition to the physical and emotional toll that the pandemic took on the community, parishioners were denied the ability to attend in-person Mass, which is of critical spiritual importance in the Catholic faith. Likewise, the cancellations or severe curtailments of baptisms, weddings, funerals, and other ceremonies of enormous religious and personal significance was difficult for many members of the Catholic faith. Nevertheless, the Diocese abided by the State’s severe restrictions — and imposed its own exacting restrictions on its various parishes, even in advance of the state mandate to shutter — because doing so was in the best interest of the health and welfare of the diocese’s community.”
Once the state lifted its closure order, the diocese reopened its churches but only after careful planning and safety measures implemented by a special committee organized by Bishop DiMarzio and headed by Joseph Esposito, the former commissioner of the New York City Office of Emergency Management.
The lawsuit outlines the measures put in place by the bishop at the recommendation of the committee, including adhering to social distancing, the mandatory wearing of face masks, and making hand sanitizers available
Many churches have room for 800 or more people and can still safely allow for social distancing, Bishop DiMarzio said in a recent interview.
“Our churches are so large,” he said. “We still can be a safe harbor.”
While several neighborhoods in Brooklyn and Queens have seen increases in COVID-19 cases, the churches have not seen a spike, according to the bishop.
The diocese lawsuit is part of a trend of religious freedom suits across the country.
Father Trevor Burfitt, a priest in charge of mission churches in four counties in California — Kern, San Bernardino, Los Angeles San Diego — filed a lawsuit against California Gov. Gavin Newsom in Kern County Superior Court on Sept. 29.
The Capitol Hill Baptist Church filed suit against the city of Washington D.C. and Mayor Muriel Bowser on Sept. 22. The U.S. Department of Justice is siding with the church in the legal matter. The DOJ filed a document known as a “statement of interest” in the case.
The Thomas More Society filed a lawsuit on Aug. 12 against Gov. Newsom on behalf of Grace Community Church in Los Angeles. The lawsuit contends that attendance restrictions should not be placed on churches because the government did not place restrictions on protest demonstrations.
The Thomas More Society also filed a lawsuit against Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz over the rule mandating that churchgoers wear face masks.
How can New York Governor Andrew Cuomo allow certain gatherings like protests, but then say controlled gatherings where strict protocols are being followed are “mass gatherings?”
The lawsuit comes down to an attack on religious freedom. Randy Mastro of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, the attorney who is filing the lawsuit on behalf of the diocese, joins Currents News to discuss in legal terms how the governor is overstepping his authority.
“Good morning everyone” Stephanie Campanella exclaims to her first class of the day as she greets them over Zoom.
For about a month, students were in class with her. That changed after New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced on Monday that schools in what are being called COVID red zones would have to close.
Stephanie’s school, Our Lady of Grace Catholic Academy in Gravesend, Brooklyn was one of them. They had to switch to remote learning with less than twenty-four hours’ notice.
Stephanie says the new school day looks very similar to the old, especially since they still have live classes.
It’s “honestly as if we were still in the building,” she told Currents News. ‘There is a lot more work that goes with it. Because you have to make sure that you find all the different videos, extra videos on top of it,” she added.
“We try to keep our enthusiasm level as much as we can, as if the students were in class. We play different games with them on Zoom. And we make sure they’re engaged with us, and not falling asleep,’ she said.
On Oct. 8 that included an “escape the room”-themed game: problem solving made fun.
“We got to do teams, so it was really fun, we were competing,” explained Stephanie’s student, Anastasia Chabanov. “It makes it more interactive than just sitting and doing assignments.”
Our Lady of Grace Catholic Academy is one of 10 schools in the red and orange zone forced to close with the new COVID restrictions. The other schools are Good Shepherd Catholic Academy, Midwood Catholic Academy, St. Athanasius Catholic Academy, Edmund Elementary School, St. Edmund Preparatory High School, Brooklyn Jesuit, Our Lady of Perpetual Help Catholic Academy of Brooklyn, Our Lady Queen of Martyrs Catholic Academy and St. Nicholas of Tolentine Catholic Academy.
Over 2,700 students affected have had to switch to an online learning model.
It’s a lot of extra work, but Stephanie says she’s happy to do it. She added that the only real challenge has been seeing her students sad to be home.
She also felt bad for parents that had less than a day to find childcare.
Parents are still paying tuition during this time. It’s not yet clear how long the school will have to remain closed, but we do know that it will be 14 days minimum.